<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guy BjerkeIs Shaw&#8217;s Weapon Station Proposal Worth a Look? &#8211; Guy Bjerke</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.guybjerke.com</link>
	<description>Helping Leaders Communicate and Connect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 03:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">38863529</site>		<item>
		<title>Is Shaw&#8217;s Weapon Station Proposal Worth a Look?</title>
		<link>https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/</link>
		<comments>https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Bjerke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://example.org/is_shaws_weapon</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[Former Assemblymember Joe Canciamilla has authored a pretty persuasive opinion piece in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times arguing that Shaw Environmental&#8217;s bid for the Concord Naval Weapon Station merits &#8211; at least &#8211; a very close and serious evaluation. &#34;&#8230;While I understand the initial shock in the Concord community to the proposal to transfer the Naval [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Former Assemblymember Joe Canciamilla has authored a pretty persuasive opinion piece in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times arguing that Shaw Environmental&#8217;s bid for the Concord Naval Weapon Station merits &#8211; at least &#8211; a very close and serious evaluation. &#34;&#8230;While I understand the initial shock in the Concord community to the proposal to transfer the Naval [&#8230;]]]></content:encoded>
	

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">45</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>