<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guy BjerkeLand Use &#8211; Guy Bjerke</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.guybjerke.com/category/land-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.guybjerke.com</link>
	<description>Helping Leaders Communicate and Connect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Sep 2012 03:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">38863529</site>		<item>
		<title>Is Shaw&#8217;s Weapon Station Proposal Worth a Look?</title>
		<link>https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/</link>
		<comments>https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 12:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Bjerke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://example.org/is_shaws_weapon</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[Former Assemblymember Joe Canciamilla has authored a pretty persuasive opinion piece in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times arguing that Shaw Environmental&#8217;s bid for the Concord Naval Weapon Station merits &#8211; at least &#8211; a very close and serious evaluation. &#34;&#8230;While I understand the initial shock in the Concord community to the proposal to transfer the Naval [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Former Assemblymember Joe Canciamilla has authored a pretty persuasive opinion piece in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times arguing that Shaw Environmental&#8217;s bid for the Concord Naval Weapon Station merits &#8211; at least &#8211; a very close and serious evaluation. &#34;&#8230;While I understand the initial shock in the Concord community to the proposal to transfer the Naval [&#8230;]]]></content:encoded>
	

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.guybjerke.com/2007/01/06/is_shaws_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">45</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SB 521 &#8211; A bill from BART</title>
		<link>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/07/24/sb_521_a_bill_f/</link>
		<comments>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/07/24/sb_521_a_bill_f/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jul 2005 09:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Bjerke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://example.org/sb_521_a_bill_f</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[Lisa Vorderbrueggen&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times &#8211; A tiff about transit villages &#8211; explains in greater detail the fears expressed by Mary Phelps in yesterday&#8217;s letters.&#160; It also confirms my point about it not being about developers: &#34;Ironically, the bill is intended to produce more housing within transit villages, not toss Grandma onto [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Lisa Vorderbrueggen&#8217;s column in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times &#8211; A tiff about transit villages &#8211; explains in greater detail the fears expressed by Mary Phelps in yesterday&#8217;s letters.&#160; It also confirms my point about it not being about developers: &#34;Ironically, the bill is intended to produce more housing within transit villages, not toss Grandma onto [&#8230;]]]></content:encoded>
	

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/07/24/sb_521_a_bill_f/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">118</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame the Developers</title>
		<link>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/07/23/blame_the_devel/</link>
		<comments>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/07/23/blame_the_devel/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Bjerke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://example.org/blame_the_devel</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[Mary Phelps writes a &#34;Your Turn&#34; letter in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times entitled &#34;Stop scary transit-village bill&#34;.&#160; I&#8217;d point to it &#8211; but the Time&#8217;s website and RSS feed are currently making it unavailable.&#160; It&#8217;s on page A21 of the print edition. Mary expresses very legitimate concerns about the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent &#34;Kelo&#34; decision on [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Mary Phelps writes a &#34;Your Turn&#34; letter in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times entitled &#34;Stop scary transit-village bill&#34;.&#160; I&#8217;d point to it &#8211; but the Time&#8217;s website and RSS feed are currently making it unavailable.&#160; It&#8217;s on page A21 of the print edition. Mary expresses very legitimate concerns about the Supreme Court&#8217;s recent &#34;Kelo&#34; decision on [&#8230;]]]></content:encoded>
	

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/07/23/blame_the_devel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">121</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Butterflies, Progress and Cows</title>
		<link>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/04/24/butterflies_pro/</link>
		<comments>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/04/24/butterflies_pro/#respond</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2005 10:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Guy Bjerke</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Land Use]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://example.org/butterflies_pro</guid>

				<description><![CDATA[There is an article in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times that illustrates why overzealousness (is that even a word?) almost always backfires.&#160; And while the headline and beginning of the story lays blame at growth &#8211; or the provision of shelter for humans &#8211; the recovery efforts are also paid for, in part, by developers.&#160; My [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[There is an article in today&#8217;s Contra Costa Times that illustrates why overzealousness (is that even a word?) almost always backfires.&#160; And while the headline and beginning of the story lays blame at growth &#8211; or the provision of shelter for humans &#8211; the recovery efforts are also paid for, in part, by developers.&#160; My [&#8230;]]]></content:encoded>
	

		<wfw:commentRss>https://www.guybjerke.com/2005/04/24/butterflies_pro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">137</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>